A Good Lawyer, Chapter 2

Yesterday, I started reviewing/posting excerpts from Stephen Comiskey’s book “A Good Lawyer.”  It is five chapters long, and I’ll be posting on each chapter over the next week or so.  As I mentioned, I think it’s a must read, and I would encourage all lawyers to try and get their hands on a copy.  It looks like it’s out of print, but three of the five chapters are available online at the Texas Bar Journal website (and I’ll be posting links to those chapters that are available).  If any of you know an online source for the other two chapters, please let me know.  Otherwise, you can order hard copies of the missing chapters from the Texas Bar Journal.

Anyway, on to Chapter 2.  Chapter 2 is devoted to the tools that lawyers have to represent clients.  But Comiskey opens chapter 2 with a couple of paragraphs that are probably more true today than when he wrote the book 11 years ago:

Abraham Lincoln said it nearly 150 years ago and it’s still true today, but for all who seek success: “The leading rule for the lawyer, as for the man of every other calling, is diligence.”  But diligence comes with a price:  Legal Fees.  But lack of diligence often comes with a higher price: Failure.  Therein lies just one of the good lawyer’s consistent dilemmas:  How do you know when you have done enough to be certain of winning?  When should you stop preparing?  It cannot be said any simpler than Benjamin Franklin said it nearly 200 years ago: “Time is money.” Lincoln’s lament that “All a lawyer has is his time and his advice,” only serves to underscore the good lawyer’s problem.

Clients want cost-effective success and they are not usually concerned with the niceties or nuances of lawyering.  Clients hope their lawyers arae spending every waking moment only thinking and working on their case, but only charging them for ultimate success, or at least only charging them for substantial progress towards ultimate success.  From a client’s perspective, it’s a buyer’s market.  The sooner all lawyers recognize that we are in a service business, and, therefore, the sooner all lawyers force ourselves to serve our clients, the sooner all our clients will be receptive to entertaining real discussions on the factual, legal and ethical constraints involved with lawyering.  Right now most just don’t care.

Now, my favorite “Tools” that Comiskey describes in Chapter 2 of his book:

1. Quiet contemplation is not a luxury, but a necessity for a lawyer.

4. Read everything you can. Ideas will come to you while you are reading.

5. When you think of something or get an idea write it down as soon as possible, in a stream of consciousness manner, and write as much of it as possible. Once you have it written down, then you can start rethinking it, revising it, or critically taking it apart.

8. Your reputation wins clients. Your performance wins trials. Like a professional golfer, it’s only how you perform that matters. No one wins a trial, or a golf tournament, on reputation.

9. Your reputation is like your passport. It’s critical that it be accurate and up to date. But once it gets you in the door it serves no further purpose. It’s only what you do once you’re there that counts.

12. Don’t complain and don’t whine. Propose constructive alternatives and argue for their adoption.

16. Understand and be able to use by yourself, if necessary, every single thing in your law offices, e.g., word-processing computers, systems, telecommunications, networks, postage meters and scales, fax machines, etc. Don’t be absolutely dependent upon anyone other than yourself.

17. Don’t wait for things to happen. As soon as you’ve accepted a case, make a plan and then begin executing that plan. Massage and retool it as the case progresses to and through completion.

22. By everything you say and do, ensure that your clients and your staff understand that you have no tolerance for dishonesty.

24. Be thankful that you are in a profession with unlimited possibilities to help individuals and society.

25. Be a responsible steward of your talents and use your persuasive skills appropriately.

26. Leave your mark.

29. Use a tailored Legal Representation and Fee Agreement Letter for each client and for each matter. Spell out in that written letter from you to your client, at the least, what the legal matter is, what the fee arrangement is, how often you will bill, what your expectations and the client’s agreements are concerning timing of payments of your bills, any retainer provisions, including interest on retainers and replenishment of retainers, whether your legal representation includes the filing of a lawsuit and trial representation, and if so, whether it includes the appeal of any trial court rulings or orders, and, finally, the fact that you have made no promises of success to your client. Explain that costs are not included in legal fees, and that under all circumstances, the client will be responsible for all costs. Emphasize that you will keep costs to a minimum. At the conclusion of the letter and after your signature line, have typed in SEEN AND AGREED. Go over the Legal Representation and Fee Agreement Letter with your client and if the client agrees, have them sign as such under SEEN AND AGREED and date their signature. Keep the original in your file and give your client a copy of the letter agreement.  (A BIG “AMEN” ON THIS ONE FROM ALL OF US THAT PRACTICE PLAINTIFF’S LEGAL MALPRACTICE WORK.  BROOKS)

31. As a final check, before you authorize anything that will be passed on to your client as a cost, imagine that your roles are reversed, and that you are now the client: Do you want your money spent this way? If you do, then go ahead. If you have to think about it, then you probably don’t.

34. You do your client a disservice if you cannot maintain your objectivity about their case. Be passionately objective, if you must, but be objective.

37. Develop your theory of the case as soon as possible. Before trial keep fine tuning it so that everything you know about the case is compatible with your theory of the case.

38. Tailor your theory of the case to fit the facts, not the reverse.

46. Don’t expect much more in Answers to Written Interrogatories than names and addresses of the people involved and descriptions of the documents involved. No matter how artful your Written Interrogatories are, opposing counsel will usually try to find ways either to object or to provide nonresponsive answers. Therefore, realistically, their best use is to determine exactly who to depose and what documents to request be produced.

47. Use Requests for Admissions continuously and exhaustively. Write short, simple factual statements that provide no wriggle room for opposing counsel. The more you can get your opponent to admit, the less you will have to prove.

55. Before sending them, proofread your bills from your client’s perspective: Service, Satisfaction, Success.

64. Whenever you take on a new case or matter, don’t put the file down until you’ve satisfied yourself that you know what the statute of limitations is and then make the appropriate tickler file entries including, especially, the date the statute of limitations expires, and prior warnings to yourself that leave enough time for you to do all that needs to be done prior to that statute of limitations’ expiration date. (ANOTHER “AMEN” FROM THE PLAINTIFF’S LEGAL MALPRACTICE BAR.)

68. Checklists are better than standard forms. Collect checklists from every source available and combine them with your own to create master checklists that you can then use, and reuse, to craft the appropriate documents for each situation.

Again, I’d love to hear your thoughts on the writings.

Brooks

To contact Austin Personal Injury Lawyer, Austin Personal Attorney, Austin Accident Lawyer, Austin Injury Lawyer Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP or to learn more about Austin Personal Injury visit http://www.civtrial.com/.

A Good Lawyer

At the Texas Trial Lawyer’s Association annual meeting last week, Dallas trial lawyer Al Ellis gave a talk on what it means to be a trial lawyer.  During the speech he reminded me of a little book that I haven’t thought of in a while.

In 1997, Washington D.C. Lawyer Stephen Comiskey wrote “A Good Lawyer:  Secrets Good Lawyers [and their clients] Already Know.”  It’s a small book —the size of a small index card and about 1/4 inch thick — with a lot of wisdom.  Al sent the book to my partner Mark in 2002, and shortly thereafter, Mark gave it to me, and I read it.   But I hadn’t thought about it in a while until Al mentioned it this month in his speech.  This weekend, I went back and read it, and I wanted to share some of the information in it with others.  The book  is five chapters long, and I’ll have one post looking at each chapter over the next week or so.

The book is an easy read, primarily in bullet points.  Instead of cluttering up the book’s content with my own thoughts, I’m primarily going to paste the bullet points I think are most important.  However, I think each lawyer should read the entire book.  Unfortunately, it doesn’t look like the book is in print any longer, but it was reprinted in whole over a several month period in the Texas Bar Journal in 2003.  Inexplicably, chapters 1, 2 and 5 are available online (and I’ll link to those), but chapters 3 and 4 are nowhere to be found.

Anyway, on to Chapter 1, which deals with The Players in the legal system — the lawyers, clients, judges and juries.  In prefacing his bullets, Comiskey notes:

Who are we lawyers?  Our families, friends, neighbors, and, most amazingly, total strangers, turn to us with their most personal and consequential matters and we all, both they and us, are confident we can assist them.  And we do assist them.  We manage crises.  We work the problems.  We do the deals.  We try the cases.  We serve our clients…

What are each of these player’s expectations of us and how can we meet theirs as well as our own expectations and aspirations?  How can we treat each of them as we want to be treated?  How can we balance their competing demands on us and remain true to ourselves and our clients?  In the heat of the lawyering battles we need unwavering principles to guide us steadfastly.  In the throes of the storms we need lighthouses and buoys to ensure we steer clear of dangers and distractions as we complete our mission and return home.  These good lawyers secrets are the guideposts that serve those purposes.  They serve us all.  They serve us well.

And my favorites of his guideposts are:

1. Lawyers are the custodians of the ideals of our society.

2. Honor, courage, and commitment are the heart and the soul and the body of a lawyer.

5. Lawyering requires working hard, but it’s not hard work. Thinking is hard, but it’s not hard work either. I can’t define hard work for you, but I know it when I see it. Long hours alone don’t define hard work. People who do hard work for a living understand this. You should, too.

13. Trial lawyers have a hard time delegating.

14. Be known as the lawyer who makes deals not breaks them.

15. Create and propose legitimate, sound alternatives to get your client to the desired end result. Think of ways to accomplish things, not reasons why they won’t work or can’t be done. Be a closer.

23. It is important that everyone that you deal with have universal faith in the accuracy of what you say and give to them.

27. Be proud of what you do and what you have done for each of your clients. It is your life’s work and your personal and professional legacy, not only to your family, but to those who follow you to strive to master the art of lawyering.

28. Know who your client is.

29. Remember who your client is.

51. If you can’t do it sincerely, don’t do it. Little children and juries recognize, appreciate, and reward sincerity. Juries punish insincerity.

66. Each individual has their own personal dignity, just as they have their own personal shadow, that varies with the amount and the angle of light shining on that person. Our democratic society, and our justice system within our democracy, will only last as long as we continue to recognize that that dignity, even of the weakest or the vilest amongst us, requires our equal treatment of every one of us under our laws. This is the lawyer’s gospel. Be prepared to fight and to die for it.

In the next post, I’ll have excerpts from Chapter 2, The Tools of the lawyer.  In the meantime, if any of you have read the book, I’d love to hear any feedback or your favorite tips if I haven’t included them in mine.

Brooks

To contact Austin Personal Injury Lawyer, Austin Personal Attorney, Austin Accident Lawyer, Austin Injury Lawyer Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP or to learn more about Austin Personal Injury visit http://www.civtrial.com/.

Sorry For The Lack Of Posts

I have gone longer than I like without posting, but we recently started a trial in a trucking case.  I decided that it was best to limit posts during the actual trial.  I’ll try and keep up my end of the posting bargain after the trial ends, which will probably be next week.  I hope to do a series on the trial.

One thing of interest during the interim was my radio interview on www.midweekpolitics.com.  Starting at this week’s 11:00 mark, I discussed my thoughts on potential claims arising from the Black Friday Wal-Mart stampede.

To contact Austin Personal Injury Lawyer, Austin Personal Attorney, Austin Accident Lawyer, Austin Injury Lawyer Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP or to learn more about Austin Personal Injury visit http://www.civtrial.com/.

Some Problems With Judicial Elections

Yesterday was the start of early voting in Texas. While the presidential campaign gets all the hype, three Texas Supreme Court justices are up for re-election, and the election highlights some of the problems with judicial elections.

The first is campaign contributions. Earlier this month, the non-profit Texans for Public Justice issued a report on “courtroom contributions” to Supreme Court candidates. The report had startling findings. The three incumbents have raised $1.6 million between them from January 2007 and June 2008. Sixty-five percent of those donations came from parties, lawyers or other people that had cases in front of the court. Justice Dale Wainwright had a whopping 71 percent of his contributions came from these “courtroom contributors.”

Unfortunately, the Democratic challengers were no better. During the same time period surveyed, the three Democratic challengers collected $722,167, with 69 percent of that money from lawyers and litigants who had recent business before the Supreme Court.

The stock response is that attorneys with business before the state’s various courts are the ones that know the judges, are interested in the outcome, and have an incentive to donate. Maybe so, but something appears wrong with a system where the bulk of the contributions come from people business before the state’s courts.

A second problem is that it’s almost impossible to be an informed voter on issues. I can’t tell you the number of emails I receive asking for recommendations on judicial elections. I’m informed on the judicial elections that affect my practice, but even as a lawyer, I don’t have a clue about some of the judges running for the various criminal courts. If politically active lawyers don’t know, how is the general public supposed to know about judges?

I don’t really have a better suggestion for a better system at this point, but I definitely think it’s worth looking into.

To contact Austin Personal Injury Lawyer, Austin Personal Attorney, Austin Accident Lawyer, Austin Injury Lawyer Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP or to learn more about Austin Personal Injury visit http://www.civtrial.com/.

Blog Action Day: Poverty

Today is Blog Action Day, an event where bloggers unite on one day to discuss a single issue. This year’s topic is poverty, which is fitting since I was asked to participate in this event by my friend Kerry Qunell at the Capital Area Food Bank.

I thought I’d take a little different spin and talk about Volunteer Legal Services of Central Texas. VLS is one of two local non-profits that focus on providing legal services to low-income people in the Central Texas area.  It provides clinics to answer legal questions and matches up local volunteer attorneys with low-income clients that need representation in different matters.  In 2007, attorneys volunteering through VLS provided 16,096 hours of free legal services, valued at $4,426,488 in uncharged fees, to benefit 4,381 people.

We’re big supporters of VLS.  Mark has served on its board of directors, and last year, we were the proud recipient of the VLS Judge Joe Hart Award, which is “presented annually to a law firm that has demonstrated the integrity and dedication to legal services to the poor exemplified by Mr. Hart throughout his legal and judicial career.”

Thanks go out to all of those who support VLS and the other organizations featured in today’s Blog Action Day.

To contact Austin Personal Injury Lawyer, Austin Personal Attorney, Austin Accident Lawyer, Austin Injury Lawyer Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP or to learn more about Austin Personal Injury visit http://www.civtrial.com/.

5 Non-Law Blogs and 5 Legal Bloggers

This weekend, I was tagged by the Torts Prof professors to participate in the latest legal blog meme by naming 5 non-law blogs I find interesting and tagging 5 other legal bloggers to do the same.  Because Austin is the #1 blogging city in the country, I thought I’d make my lists with a little local flair.

Five Blogs I Read Regularly and Find Interesting:

Barking Carnival — a blog dedicated to University of Texas and college sports

Zen La La — This is the blog of my friend Sara Hickman.  Sara is a musician, activist and mom.  She’s one of the most generous people I know (and you can get a taste of that from reading her blog), and the world would be a little better place if we aspired to do what she does.  And in a town filled with musicians, Grammy Awards, and stars, Sara is my only friend that has appeared on The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson (in my mind, still the “REAL” Tonight Show, with no offense to Leno).

Burnt Orange Report — A blog that covers Texas politics from the liberal perspective.

Some Assembly Required — Thom Singer is an Austin writer and speaker, among other things.  Though he’s in Austin, I’ve never met him.  I stumbled across his blog on a random Google search about Leadership Austin, a local group that we apparently both participate in.  I’ve continued to read the blog because I find his posts interesting and thought provoking.

Presentation Zen —  Obviously not a local blog, but I think Garr Reynolds is a genius and every trial lawyer in the country should read his book and blog.

Five Other Bloggers to Tag:

Keeping it in Austin, I tag Todd Smith, a local appellate lawyer, and Jamie Spencer, one of the original and most prolific Austin attorney bloggers.

In the personal injury arena, I would love to hear the thoughts of Bill Marler or John Day.

And finally, like Anne Reed and Eric Turkewitz, I’ll tag Scott Greenfield in hopes that he’ll finally contribute.

To contact Austin Personal Injury Lawyer, Austin Personal Attorney, Austin Accident Lawyer, Austin Injury Lawyer Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP or to learn more about Austin Personal Injury visit http://www.civtrial.com/.

We Are Back

Some of you may have noticed that the blog has been AWOL for the last few days.  Unfortunately, our internet provider moved over to new servers, and the blog didn’t make it.  I think we have the technical errors corrected, and we should be up and running back to normal.  Thanks for your patience.

To contact Austin Personal Injury Lawyer, Austin Personal Attorney, Austin Accident Lawyer, Austin Injury Lawyer Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP or to learn more about Austin Personal Injury visit http://www.civtrial.com/.

Justice Medina’s Saga Continues

As we’ve previously written, Republican Supreme Court Justice Medina and his wife were indicted last month by a Harris County grand jury for conduct relating to a fire at their home. Shortly thereafter, the Republican district attorney had the indictments dismissed.

Now the case takes another twist. Six members of the grand jury have sued so they can speak out about the evidence in the case. The jurors contend that the district attorney and other lawyers in his office have waived any privileges of secrecy by continually talking about the case.

I don’t know where this will go, but it’s obviously not going away any time soon.

To contact Austin Personal Injury Lawyer, Austin Personal Attorney, Austin Accident Lawyer, Austin Injury Lawyer Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP or to learn more about Austin Personal Injury visit http://www.civtrial.com/.

Texas Supreme Court Justice Indicted

Not many details are out, but KHOU tv in Houston is reporting that Texas Supreme Court Justice David Medina and his wife have been indicted in connection with an arson fire at their home last summer.  We’ll have more details and thoughts as the story unfolds.

To contact Austin Personal Injury Lawyer, Austin Personal Attorney, Austin Accident Lawyer, Austin Injury Lawyer Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP or to learn more about Austin Personal Injury visit http://www.civtrial.com/.

Austin Law Blogs

This is a diversion from our regular personal injury and litigation news, but I saw Kevin O’Keefe had a post earlier this week that Austin was the top blogging city in the country. If that’s the case, why are there so few law blogs in town. Aside from this one, the only active law blogs I know of are the following:

Todd Smith’s Texas Appellate Law Blog

Jamie Spencer’s Austin Criminal Defense Lawyer and Austin DWI Lawyer blogs

Wayne Schiess’s Legalwriting.net blog

Michael Fox’s Jottings By An Employer’s Lawyer

Don Cruse’s Supreme Court of Texas blog

Taralynn Mackay’s A Nurse Attorney’s Thoughts and Texas Nursing Jurisprudence blogs

In a town this size, with this many tech-savvy attorneys, I would expect more blogs. And if I left any active blogs off, please let me know (and yes, there are other old blogs or “blogs” that are just advertisements, that I didn’t include — I don’t need to know about them).

To contact Austin Personal Injury Lawyer, Austin Personal Attorney, Austin Accident Lawyer, Austin Injury Lawyer Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP or to learn more about Austin Personal Injury visit http://www.civtrial.com/.

Perlmutter & Schuelke, LLP maintains offices in Austin, Texas. However, our attorneys and lawyers represent clients throughout the state of Texas, including Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, Forth Worth, El Paso, New Braunfels, San Marcos, Kyle, Buda, Round Rock, Georgetown, Lockhart, Bastrop, Elgin, Manor, Brenham, Cedar Park, Burnet, Marble Falls, Temple and Killeen.

Law Firm Marketing and Attorney Website Design - SEOLawFirm.com